← All work

03 · Logistics

An eight-step form, replaced by a conversation

I redesigned scenario creation around intent, while keeping pricing and operational constraints inside a deterministic engine.

  • Conversation design
  • Rules engine
  • System architecture
Working prototype 03 Logistics

01 · Context and ambiguity

The useful problem was underneath the brief.

Users had to translate a business scenario into an eight-step configuration flow before the product could help them evaluate it.

02 · Decisions

I made the system explicit before polishing the surface.

  1. I let conversation capture intent without asking users to learn the data model.
  2. I kept calculations and constraint resolution outside the language model.
  3. I made assumptions editable before a scenario could be committed.

03 · Human and AI boundary

Automation got a lane. Judgment kept ownership.

The LLM interpreted intent and narrated results. A deterministic rules engine owned pricing, validation, and constraint resolution.

04 · Working prototype

The artifact became the research surface.

The prototype connected conversational input to structured scenario data, visible assumptions, and comparable outcomes.

05 · Outcome

What changed

The team could evaluate conversational UX without compromising the reliability of the underlying operational model.

The system boundary was tested in a functional prototype rather than a static chat mockup.

Let’s make the system clear.

I work best where AI, complex workflows, and human judgment meet. If that sounds like your product, I would like to hear about it.